Intellectual property rights

The protection of intellectual property rights in one of the foundations of our economy and is responsible for all the modern gadgets we use including the computers used in writing and reading this weblog.

Yes, in that property rights are one of the major ways in which we restrict competition in our economy.

But we might be better off if we didn’t protect intellectual property.

Here’s an article which claims Germany was able to quickly industrialize and catch up to the British because that country was slow in enacting copyright legislation.

I have read that during the British industrial revolution patent legislation was loosely enforced if at all and  there was  considerable circulation of ideas.  Some of the major inventors did not get rich and some died poor.

If the Romans had had copyright we would not have the Bible and if the Elizabethans had had copyright we would not have Shakespeare. It may be that a lot of creative people are motivated by things other than money.

If we didn’t have patent and copyright we might now be using more advanced and much cheaper computers, some of the world’s most difficult diseases might have been dealt with and the Olympics would probably a lot less commercial.

On the other hand, British Columbia coastal natives are quite possessive of their dances and songs.  While watching some visiting dancers I  asked the lady who led her band’s dancing if she was noting some of the steps to incorporate into her own dancing. She was somewhat emphatic in telling me she couldn’t do that because the dance belonged to those dancers and couldn’t be used without permission.  That was a part of their culture.

One of the features of perfect competition is that there must be no barriers to people getting into a field.  If we really wanted a competitive market economy we would abolish patent and copyright legislation.


If you liked this post your are invited to comment, press the like button and/or click  one of the share buttons. If you disagree you are invited to say why in a comment.  While I like the idea of sharing this platform, my personality is such that I don’t reply to many comments.

One Response

  1. I largely agree. IP and Copywrite law in the US is excessively protective. Some incentive is needed, but most economists agree that the length of protection in the US is excessive. How long is optimal? Nobody has managed to work out an effective model. My guess is that copyright should not last more than 30 years. Most patents after ten years are valueless, as shown by the fall off in renewel fees. All but a tiny fraction of books and music are not sold afer twenty years. But the copyright interests in the US are massive.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: