Charlie can’t breathe
The most evil of all people are those who believe they can force their religion, beliefs, values and will upon others. There are evil people in all nations, religions and cultures.
Inequality is an issue that will probably never go away because it has traditionally been the natural order and because its solution, perfect competition, is something few people will be able to accept.
Inequality was a feature of Roman and Medieval societies and probably of most historical large-scale civilizations. To find true equality one would probably have to look to small tribal groups where everybody knew each other and were probably related. (I suspect these groups had relationship problems in that lots of people didn’t speak to each other.)
In historical civilizations the elite depended upon the work of the peasants for their food and luxuries. The challenge was to confiscate as much of the agricultural surplus as possible while leaving enough for subsistence. Probably a factor in the calculations was the supply of workers. If there was a shortage, the workers were able to retain a little more than when there was a good supply.
Inequality has historically been so much the norm that the general prosperity following the industrial revolution should be considered an aberration. One of the things which has happened since the start of the industrial revolution has been the exploitation of energy and mineral resources found in the earth’s crust. The result has been a lot of prosperity which had to be shared with most of the population because the prosperity depended upon the labor of the working people. Once again supply of workers was a concern and generally there was a shortage – until recently. With a limited supply of labor the elite had to tolerate sharing some of the wealth.
In historical times the agricultural surplus was probably taken with the use of force or the threat of its use. Since the industrial revolution the elite has discovered a less messy way of getting the greater share – legislation which restricts competition and allows for profits. If we had perfect competition there would be no profits, we would have equality and the one percent would be just like the rest of us. Licensing, copyrights, patents, health and safety regulations and tariffs all work to restrict competition. If we did not have copyright Bill Gates would be just another programmer and we would all be using super great software. Recent prosperity has been so great leaving some for the rest of us was not an issue.
Other ways in which the elite exploit us are by the work ethic and debt. So long as we believe in the divine nature of work we will continue to produce the profits which the elite need to maintain their fortunes. So long as our money system is based on debt we will be chained to our employers.
It may be the golden age of prosperity is coming to an end. We still have lots of mineral and energy resources but the most easily accessible have been taken. It now takes more energy and effort to get at what is left and this limits the potential for future growth.
With the end of growth and a surplus of workers we are ripe for a return to historical inequality.where the elites take for themselves most of the agricultural surplus and leave a minimum for everybody else. The difference is that we now have technology to replace workers. This guy does not want to think about the implications of this.
It is my understanding that in some parts of the United States some local level governments are getting a significant part of their revenues from petty fines enforced by police. This source of revenue falls heaviest on poor people. The justice of this program is questionable. Another source of revenue is called civil forfeiture where authorities confiscate the proceeds of crime even if there has been no conviction. Once again this has potential for abuse and raises justice questions. I am sad to report that my home province of British Columbia uses this process.
I have to wonder if these developments are part of increasing inequality and a return to inequality enforced with force in that they have a lot of potential for abuse of poor people and involve police.
This writer is pessimistic about the future. To increase equality we will probably have to increase competition and introduce an income scheme. These are controversial concepts although they will never come into being if we don’t talk about them. In the meantime, probably the best way for individuals to deal with inequality is to become a part of the minority and one does that by taking advantage of legislation which restricts competition.
If you liked this post your are invited to comment, press the like button and/or click one of the share buttons. If you disagree you are invited to say why in a comment. While I like the idea of sharing this platform, my personality is such that I don’t reply to many comments.