Here is a link to an article from the Mises Institute opposing regulations for the American payday lending industry.
This simple proposal to regulate short-term lending raises important questions about how we treat poor people, about the role of money in our economy and how we regulate business activity.
This writer believes we should have a collective responsibility to ensure every one has the opportunity for the same standard of living as most other people. Probably the best way to meet this responsibility would be a universal basic income scheme. Such a program would not stop everyone from mismanaging their finances but it should eliminate the need for a lot of short-term credit.
Money can be an instrument of exploitation and is based on the debt created when banks make loans. Debt is a path to slavery, especially for poor people.
We need a radical revision of the way in which we create money. We treat money as a commodity which has its own intrinsic value. We would be better to treat money as a tool to facilitate the exchange of goods and services. As a tool rather than a commodity there would be no need for interest. Also the total amount of money available needs to be flexible up and down as the quantity of goods and services we need to exchange expands or retracts. This guy has written extensively on this topic on his weblog and in his book.
As much as possibly economic forces, competition, should be used to regulate business activity. The more competition the fewer profits and the less need for regulation. Regulations tend to restrict competition, allow greater profits and increase the demand for more regulations.
This writer is not enthusiastic about supporting the payday loan industry but does recognize that in our society there is a need for short-term credit. I also believe there is a need to reform our financial system and the reforms could reduce the need for credit from all of us including the poor.